Public Affairs Association of Canada Comments on the Proposed changes to Ontario’s Lobbyists Registration Act, 1998

TORONTO, July 26, 2012 /CNW/ – On July 25, 2012, the Ontario Government stated that it is proposing changes to the rules governing the disclosure of lobbying activity in Ontario. The objective of the proposed legislative changes is to increase transparency and accountability in the conduct of lobbying activity. The proposed changes include:

  1. Giving the Integrity Commissioner/Lobbyist Registrar more enforcement powers, including the ability to prohibit individuals from lobbying;
  2. Providing the Integrity Commissioner/Lobbyist Registrar new investigative powers, including the ability to compel testimony and obtain key documents;
  3. Requiring lobbyists to identify the specific MPP and ministers’ offices they lobby;
  4. Preventing lobbyists from accepting success or contingency fee’s;
  5. Prohibiting lobbyists from providing paid advice to a ministry and lobbying on the same subject matter;
  6. Providing the Integrity Commissioner/Lobbyist Registrar with the ability to establish a lobbyist code of conduct;
  7. Incorporating for-profit and not-for-profit organizations under the same category of ‘in-house’ lobbyists, treating both classes of lobbyists the same and capturing more lobbying activity.

The Public Affairs Association of Canada (PAAC) welcomes these proposed changes. In fact, the PAAC has made several similar recommendations recently in its submission to the federal government’s review of its lobbying disclosure legislation such as establishing a level playing field for in-house lobbyists. “Lobbying is critical to the successful development of sound public policy”, says John Capobianco, Chair of the PAAC. “The PAAC firmly believes that these proposed changes will increase the transparency of our activities and will enhance the legitimacy of lobbying in Ontario”.

The PAAC is, however, concerned about the proposal to give the Integrity Commissioner new powers to impose administrative monetary penalties and potentially imposing temporary bans on those lobbyists found in breach of the law. “We want to make sure that imposing administrative monetary penalties is used as a last resort, when all other efforts to ensure compliance have been exhausted”, says John Capobianco. “We also want to make sure the investigative powers used by the Commissioner respect due process, the norms of procedural and administrative justice and the Charter Rights”.

“The PAAC looks forward to working with the government of Ontario as it moves its proposed legislative changes forward”.

The PAAC is a national, not for profit organization founded in 1984. Its principal objective is to help public affairs professionals succeed in their work by providing forums for professional development, the exchange of new ideas and networking. PAAC also advocates on issues that directly impact its members.

SOURCE: Public Affairs Association of Canada

8 Responses to Public Affairs Association of Canada Comments on the Proposed changes to Ontario’s Lobbyists Registration Act, 1998

  1. site August 4, 2012 at 11:08 pm

    Му partnеr and I ѕtumbled over
    hеre coming from a different pаge and thought I
    might as well check things out. I lіke ωhat I see ѕo
    now і’m following you. Look forward to finding out about your web page repeatedly.

  2. this url August 4, 2012 at 11:12 pm

    Amаzing blοg! Do you havе any suggestions for аspіring
    wгitеrs? I’m planning to start my own site soon but I’m a little lоѕt on everythіng.
    Would уou reсommend startіng ωith a fгеe platform like Woгԁρress οг go for a paid oрtіon?

    There arе so many optionѕ out there
    that I’m totally overwhelmed .. Any ideas? Kudos!

  3. what is mother nature August 5, 2012 at 1:11 am

    Hello, Neat post. There’s a problem with your site in internet explorer, might test this? IE nonetheless is the market leader and a huge part of other folks will omit your great writing due to this problem.

  4. Tonja August 5, 2012 at 5:01 am

    We stumbleԁ over herе by a ԁifferent wеb addresѕ and thοught I might as wеll check things out.
    I liκe what I see so i am just following yοu.
    Look foгwarԁ tο cheсkіng out your ωeb pаge
    for a second time.

  5. seven chakras August 5, 2012 at 8:46 pm

    Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than
    just your articles? I mean, what you say is valuable and everything.
    But imagine if you added some great images or videos to give your posts more, “pop”!
    Your content is excellent but with pics and clips, this site could definitely be
    one of the most beneficial in its niche. Wonderful blog!

  6. source August 5, 2012 at 10:55 pm

    Whаt’s up, every time i used to check website posts here in the early hours in the daylight, as i like to find out more and more.

  7. this url August 5, 2012 at 11:09 pm

    Eхсеllеnt іtems frοm you, mаn.
    I’ve understand your stuff prior to and you are just extremely great. I actually like what you have bought right here, really like what you are stating and the way in which through which you are saying it. You are making it entertaining and you still take care of to stay it sensible. I can not wait to read far more from you. This is really a tremendous website.

  8. Mhixz August 7, 2012 at 3:33 pm

    Concerned citizen1.9M out of 1.3B is less than 1% of ovlarel spend. So, they have hardly spent anything on lobbying. Do the math. If they are within the top ten carriers nationwide and they spend less than 1% on lobbying, then they are a fine example of restraint. Put this amount spent in perspective with the amount spent by small defense contractors or even alternative energy companies, and it’s nothing. I can’t help but think that a trial lawyer is running this site, given that a trial lawyer walks a fine line between helping people gain what is rightly theirs due to an injury and fleecing anyone who has the money to bleed.